Trump’s $5 Million 'Gold Card' Visa: A Deep Dive into the Controversial Proposal

In February 2025, President Donald Trump introduced a bold immigration initiative: the "Gold Card" visa. This program proposes granting U.S. permanent residency—and potentially citizenship—to foreign nationals who invest $5 million directly into the U.S. Treasury. While the administration touts this as a strategy to reduce national debt and attract affluent individuals, the proposal has ignited debates over its legality, economic viability, and ethical implications.

Understanding the 'Gold Card' Proposal

The "Gold Card" aims to replace the existing EB-5 investor visa program, which requires foreign investors to contribute between $800,000 and $1.05 million into U.S. businesses that create at least ten jobs. In contrast, the Gold Card would necessitate a $5 million payment directly to the federal government, without any job creation requirements. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick claims this could generate up to $1 trillion to help offset the national debt.

President Trump expressed optimism about the program's potential, stating, "I think it’s going to be very treasured. I think it’s going to do very well."

Legal Challenges and Congressional Approval

Despite the administration's enthusiasm, legal experts assert that the President cannot unilaterally create a new visa category or pathway to citizenship. Such changes require legislation passed by Congress. Sharvari Dalal-Dheini of the American Immigration Lawyers Association emphasized, "Congress would have to legislate a new program. I really don’t know what legal authority you would have to just create this new program out of whole cloth."

Additionally, the proposal faces skepticism within the Republican-controlled Congress. While some lawmakers support the idea, others are concerned about its departure from traditional immigration policies that prioritize family reunification and employment-based criteria.

Economic Viability and Comparisons to EB-5

The administration's projections hinge on the assumption that a significant number of wealthy individuals will participate.However, the EB-5 program, which offers a more affordable investment threshold and tangible economic benefits through job creation, issued approximately 8,000 visas in the year ending September 2022.

Critics argue that the Gold Card's lack of investment in businesses or job creation could limit its appeal and economic impact. Moreover, similar programs in other countries have had mixed results. For instance, the United Kingdom and Australia have seen limited uptake in their high-value investor visa schemes.

Ethical Concerns and National Security Implications

The notion of selling residency and citizenship raises ethical questions about equity and national values. Charles Kuck, an immigration lawyer in Atlanta, remarked, "The administration has literally no legal power to create a visa category."

Furthermore, the program could pose national security risks. Without stringent vetting processes, there's potential for individuals with questionable backgrounds to gain residency. The lack of transparency and oversight could make the U.S. vulnerable to financial crimes and other illicit activities.

Current Status and Future Outlook

As of now, the Gold Card program has not been implemented. Despite initial announcements, there is no official website or application process in place. This delay has led to skepticism about the program's feasibility and the administration's commitment to its rollout.

Given the legal, economic, and ethical challenges, the future of the Gold Card visa remains uncertain. For investors and immigration professionals, it's crucial to monitor legislative developments and consider the broader implications of such policy shifts.

Conclusion

President Trump's Gold Card proposal represents a significant departure from traditional U.S. immigration policies. While it aims to attract substantial foreign investment, the program faces considerable legal hurdles and raises concerns about fairness and national security. As the debate continues, stakeholders must weigh the potential benefits against the risks and ethical considerations inherent in monetizing pathways to U.S. residency and citizenship.

For more information and updates on U.S. immigration policies, stay connected with VisaLex.